|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
TonyB wrote:
>
> >I also tried making a variety of modifications to media, including evenly
> >spaced samples and supersampling, but I couldn't get supersampling to work
> >properly either. I now know what I was doing wrong. Make sure that when
> >you super-sample, you give the super-samples less weight in the average.
> >I.E. if you add a new sample between two existing samples, the new weights
> >of the existing samples plus the weight of the new sample should still add
> >up to the sum of the original weights of the two original samples. Ok...
> >that sounds a lot more confusing than I intended.
>
> Makes perfect sense to me.
>
> A1 = original pixel 1
> B1 = original pixel 2
> A2 = new pixel 1
> B2 = new pixel 2
> C2 = supersampled pixel between A2 and B2
>
> A1+B1 = A2+C2+B2
>
> Right?
Well, not exactly or you wouldn't need the supersampled pixel at all :)
but ideally yes (and as far as weight is concerned, yes)
Jerome
--
*******************************
* they'll tell you what can't * mailto:ber### [at] iname com
* be done and why... * http://www.enst.fr/~jberger
* Then do it. *
*******************************
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |