Ken wrote:
> 
> POV-Win experienced a performance increase between the two but I wouldn't
> call it a "big" jump. Version differences in POV-Ray itself had a greater
> impact than the compiler did. See my report in povray-FAQ group :)

It was big enough to allow POV-Win to leapfrog over povray on Linux on
identical Pentium-II hardware.  I rendered skyvase.pov (I forget the
exact settings) with 3.1d on WinNT in 349 seconds and povray 3.1e on
Linux in 388 seconds.  I don't have figures for how 3.02 performed.

-Mark Gordon

Post a reply to this message