First I was a bit shocked: Did I miss the final announcement of the
"landmark" winners? Well obviously I didn't...
In this round there were many "off-topics" too, but perhaps not so many
as in "unbelievable" - a topic that seems to be unbelievable in
itself... "Landmarks" and many other topics are kind of mor objective,
while "unbelievable" is much more up to one's own interpretation.
However there were quite a few good submissions too!

Nieminen Juha wrote:
>   I admit that I personally have this kind of prejudice. When I see an IRTC
> entry that looks great I look if it's made with povray. If it isn't, my
> interest for that image ends there. 

much the same for me...
but I would rather say "my interest for the _technical side_ of that
image ends there."

>   I have never voted and probably never will. I don't think that I can be
> an unprejudiced judge.

You should vote! And so did I.
As you surely have an opinion about the submissions, you really should
take part in the voting process too. Of course are you - as well as
every contestant - prejudiced, since you spent a lot of time with your
own thoughts and interpretations about the topic and then perhaps even
more time in putting together your scene. However, your vote is needed,
otherwise the space-pyramids and alien life forms would take over....
(yes, I'm a little bit prejudiced in this concern)...

Uwe.

Post a reply to this message