|
|
On 26 Jul 1999 07:48:32 -0400, Nieminen Mika <war### [at] cctutfi> wrote:
> Not really true. I wonder why this delusion persists.
> See http://www.students.tut.fi/~warp/povVFAQ.html#csgspeed
>
>
> (Everyone keeps saying that merge is (always) a lot slower than union,
>but no-one has ever said why. Or even proved it.)
Yeah, I have the VFAQ, Warp. I was referring to this particular case,
namely 100 or more transparent media-filled spheres. I agree that
merge can be faster in the some cases, particularly when there are a
lot of transparent objects close together (like 100-200 transparent
surfaces) and media. This is, you should agree, a rare occasion.
Peter Popov
ICQ: 15002700
Post a reply to this message
|
|