Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> Fact is there are actually no coincident surfaces anyway in Daniels
> script. The individual boxes are reduced to nine tenths their original
> size (which if left unscaled would have been a potential problem,
> maybe?). Being that much smaller however might be leading to some
> trouble though, leaving gaps between each cube.

  The only problems I foresee with that would be the increased number
of intersection tests needed. This of course can be compensated for by
increasing the max trace level to an adequate amount.

-- 
Ken Tyler
  
mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net
http://home.pacbell.net/tylereng/links.htm

Post a reply to this message