On Mon, 12 Jul 1999 22:29:15 -0400, Nathan Kopp wrote:
>The way the parser is currently written, this would not be trivial to
>add, IMHO.  Chris' suggestion is good, though (although maybe a bit slow?).

Funny you should say that.... Before I read Chris' suggestion, I went
to see how hard it would be to implement and it didn't look too 
difficult to do at least the nonrecursive case.  OTOH, it wouldn't be 
much faster than Chris' suggestion, so why make changes to the code?

Post a reply to this message