The way the parser is currently written, this would not be trivial to
add, IMHO.  Chris' suggestion is good, though (although maybe a bit slow?).

-Nathan


Peter Popov wrote:
> 
> Greetings all.
> 
> The solution I have in mind is a parse(string) function. It simply
> inserts the string in the code at the time of parsing (as include
> files and macros are treated). So you can to something like:

Post a reply to this message