|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
I envision a scene: Somebody gets a couple of thousands of frames to
calculate in his computer and spends the next few weeks doing that just to
discover that the JPG's are too poor quality (perhaps caused by that big
red object over a light background...).
A quality setting may be good for most frames, but I'm completely sure
that you can't use the same settings for all frames. There are pathologic
cases where you get artifacts no matter how much quality you set.
--
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |