|
 |
On Tue, 25 May 1999 23:29:39 -0700, "Jon A. Cruz"
<jon### [at] geocities com> wrote:
>Of course, since Win2K is just NT 5 renamed, you can then take from
>that the info that it will require even more resources than NT 4, and thus you
>will not be wanting to run that either.
I am running it. PII/333, 128M RAM. Barely acceptable performance.
When I had 64M RAM in that machine, it was ridiculously slow and
swapped all the time.
There's a reason the people who pay to be in the "beta program" get a
coupon good for a discount on more memory.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
