TonyB wrote:
>> Nice! Beeing a fractal lover me I must love it...
>Thank you. (= I thought that Attractors were chaotic and not fractal.
Perhaps
>someone could explain this to me...

That's right... I must have been a bit tired when I wrote the reply...
Attractors are often described together with fractals because they are both
a sort of deterministic chaos.
BTW, did you know that the Lorenz attractor started out as a simple model of
movement in the earths atmosphere?

>> Did a Rossler fractal my self a couple of days ago, inspired of your
Lorenz
>> attractor. Your's turned out a bit better than mine... Why is that?!? =)
>> Might be the 50000 spheres vs my 10000 spheres.
>
>That's one possibility. Another is probably the way your calculations are
made.
>Can I have a look at your source?

I can post the source later today (sitting in school right now) but it's not
that much diffrence from your result. A few more spheres (about 40000 more
or so :), smaler jumps and better textures should do it...

/Anders

Post a reply to this message