GrimDude wrote:

>   Somewhere around here I have the specifics, if you really want them
> (specific to which model of the 51?) :)

Just curiosity. It is probably equivelant in length to a 1/4 wave antenna
just by guessing and no one else around here would care one way or another.
If it's in front of you drop the number off. If you have to rumage for it
don't waste your time. If I really want to know bad enough I could find
out in fairly short order on one of the ham groups.

>   Double negatives are so confusing! Did you mean you really want another
> image, or that you are not so impressed? :)
> 
> GrimDude
> vos### [at] arkansasnet

 I meant to say I like the model work from what I can see so far but the
image you posted was lacking in size, clarity, and sharpness. I would of
course prefer to evaluate anothers art using the best medium for that
evaluation and feel I have not yet had that advantage.

-- 
Ken Tyler

mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net

Post a reply to this message