|
 |
Dear WATCH MAKER, or whoever,
I rarely post images, I think it's been two in the last twelve
months. I try to give compliments to every image, and make
suggestions as to improvements/possible further development of
the scene.
So you can probably lump me in with Spider and Ken, though they
produce far much work than myself, and their criticisms and
suggestions are from a viewpoint that has much more POV
experience and knowledge behind it than my own.
This group including Ken and Spider are also tolerant of people
who don't have a clue, and those people given this environment
grow as artists to become accomplished and esteemed individuals
within the group within a short period of time.
Cheers
Steve
_ wrote:
>
> Also I have to complain about ken..who ever he is and his butt buddy here
> spider think they are...they have no right to complain about such stupid and
> small details and errors. Like for example!
>
> A few posts down "CD-ROMs attempt at photo realism"
> ken said and I quote!
>
> "That's a nice set of table coaster you have there (don't try to figure
> it out it's an inside joke around here). Seriously this is one of the
> better attempts on this theme I have seen to date. It is evident you
> put considerable effort into it and it has paid off. Be careful with
> the use of the work photo realism. Do you want it to look like a photo,
> or do you want it to look like a real life view of this object in this
> setting, fooling the viewer that it was indeed really there ??"
> Now its a positive statement..but he has to add something negative! like
> below where he gets upset about something so stupid and small...the use of
> the word photorealism in this mans subject!
>
> KEN: "I disliket he term photo realism for the above stated argument.
> It
> seems contrary to the intent of the artist to mimic reality in a
> virtual medium."
>
> I mean come on! shut up! i dont ever see you or spider posting your
> pictures! im sure you could do a kick ass ob but come on man!
>
> _
Post a reply to this message
|
|
