|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 28 Apr 1999 15:57:06 -0500, par### [at] my-dejanews com (Ron Parker)
wrote:
>
>If the goal is to provide more dynamic range, might I suggest Daren Scot
>Wilson's unlimited light patch?
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Daren Scot's patch only serves to
compress the dynamic range of scenes to fit better into an 8
bit-per-pixel image. I wasn't aware that it would allow for higher bit
depths in the final image.
Personally, I wish that it were possible to create, display, and print
images with higher bit depths than is currently possible. The dynamic
range of 8 bpp pales in comparison to a well exposed Kodachrome slide.
Being a photographer for several years, I will never be totally
satisfied with digital imaging until the dynamic range of the images
is improved.
Later,
Glen Berry
Email: 7no### [at] ezwv com
(remove the "7" to reply via personal email)
Website: http://www.ezwv.com/~mclilith/index.html
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |