See? I managed to butcher the English language myself! :)

GrimDude wrote in message <371d7bb9.0@news.povray.org>...
>>The camera is so close to the outer sphere, that the near part is
>>perspectively magnified so much, that it appears larger than the X/Y-plane
>>"equator" which lies farther back (and where the sphere really *do* meet
at
>>the edges as expected.
>>
>
>
>I was thinking of the set of solutions that satisfy a tangential line to
the
>point <-5,0,0> (assumed), but include the camera position. This set would
be
>null in that it cannot be satisfied from the current camera location,
except
>in orthographic projection (I think).
>
>Perspective magnification, spherical aberration,....? Stymied...
>
>Thanks for being agreeable. :)
>
>GrimDude
>vos### [at] arkansasnet
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message