|
 |
Margus Ramst wrote:
>
> >...sorry about posting so much data........See i didnt think anyone
> >would even to bother to complain because its such a useless
> >complaint...anyway i will stop doing that. I for one have a cable modem and
> >sometimes i forget i had a 56 k ya know...
> >
>
> I for one only have a 33.6K modem, and half of my ISP's modems are 14.4K
> (and the rest are constantly occupied by sb. else)
> I really should change providers, but with this one I only have to pay the
> price of a local call, nothing more. So I'm cheap. Sue me.
>
> Margus
I've got a bad connection regardless of my upgraded V.90 modem. I use
AOL and I *should* be getting a 56K/V90 hookup at their end. Nope, 26.4K
the sign-on speed shows. I get up to 28K+ sometimes at a good web site
apparently but these newsgroups slow me down to those 0.1K numbers too.
The connection rate will get to 10's of K when good.
OT posting here but maybe someone should start a subject about the
connection (u/l and d/l) speeds at p.g. so as to figure possible
improvements, or at least to gripe or boast about our modems ;)
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
