POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.binaries.images : Nuke_um ! : Re: Nuke_um ! Server Time
4 Oct 2024 05:19:41 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Nuke_um !  
From: Steve
Date: 19 Apr 1999 20:34:07
Message: <371BA422.80B547D1@ndirect.co.uk>
It's certainly getting there, but I think it's lost a bit of
shape.

Steve

Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> GrimDude wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, animating it may prove difficult.
> >
> 
> You bet. Took 2h 46m to render this one, with AA on, on a 233MMX cpu. I
> used a double instance of the object though and it would have probably
> taken only 1h 45m I guess. I did so many s-l-o-w test renders at 160x120
> I gave up at this point with a 320x240 res. See what you think,
> realistic or not. I believe it's lacking a lot still. Namely better
> color differentation.
> 
> Disclaimer: nuking of any form is not necessarily endorsed by the maker
> of this image nor implied to be by the newsgroup proprietors. But you
> may want to check with the original creator and poster(s) as to their
> beliefs.
> 
> How's that for legal mumbo-jumbo?
> 
> --
>  omniVERSE: beyond the universe
>   http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
>  mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
> 
>   -----------------------------------------------------------------
>  [Image]


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.