I understand, thanks for pointing me right.


"Ronald L. Parker" wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 18 Apr 1999 02:39:49 -0500, Bob Hughes <inv### [at] aolcom>
> wrote:
> 
> >Probably the most interesting thing is the invisible object removal.
> >Heck, if that thing could remove the parsing of such I'd think it
> >miraculous. Doubt that very much.
> 
> Actually, I think it could.  Keep in mind that it's up to the person
> writing the script to deal with removing the objects; all the patch
> does is provide you with the screen dimensions.  If you know that the
> bounding box of a complex object is too small to see at thumbnail
> size, you could easily put the object in an .inc file and only include
> it if the screen size were big enough, thus eliminating the parsing
> for that object as well.

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message