Ok, time to be the critic here..
(as Ken said, (if) I can't trace, I can be a critic :-)
The sea looks good, it's a smooth heightfield, no?
I think you could do more for the sky in this image, it should really gain from
some work. (clouds and so on)

The HF should probably be in a higher resolution for this sort of image, as it
is, it's to easy to see the changes...

Hmm, I also think it lacks some feeling of "wetness" perhaps some
(specular)reflection could do it...

well, it is a good iamge, but the thing to do is the sky...

Nicholas DePetrillo wrote:
> 
> Nos is this realistic or what? looks like a photo doesnt it? well its not!
> it was made entirely in pov-ray. I am now going to render an animation (3
> seconds long) of the ocean and the waves this is liek the first frame of the
> animation. Look for the animation in the binarys.animation news group today
> or tomorrow.
> 
> STATS:
> celeron 400 overclocked to 500
> 256 megs of RAm (sdram)
> fast as hell scsi 2 hard drive 5 gigs (not much but they are expensive!)
> and wndows NT 4.0 sp 4
> 
> here is the image...tell me what you think and if it looks real...
> 
>  [Image]

-- 
//Spider
        [ spi### [at] bahnhofse ]-[ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
What I can do and what I could do, I just don't know anymore
                "Marian"
        By: "Sisters Of Mercy"

Post a reply to this message