hmm, this probably doesn't fit in this group, but should be in a separate mail
to Giles. but then, hehe.

To ease it all up with object placing and scalability, can you make the trees
all downscaled(upscaled) to a bounding_box{<0,0,0>,<10,10,10>}. This would help
a lot, and would also remove the need to recalculate the tree to fit.

I have an automated rescaler #macro here somewhere, if you are interested...



Lewis wrote:
> 
> I had another weird idea:
> Let's compile a library of trees, made with Giles macro. Using a macro
> to generate random trees, each one starts it with a different seed and
> sends in the results (the include files). It could be very useful. Maybe
> someone will need a couple of trees sometime. Instead of parsing, say,
> 100ds of them, he will just download them.
> Anyone with me? If there will be enough enthusiasm I'll set up a web
> site or somethin'.

-- 
//Spider
        [ spi### [at] bahnhofse ]-[ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
What I can do and what I could do, I just don't know anymore
                "Marian"
        By: "Sisters Of Mercy"

Post a reply to this message