|
 |
Well, this isn't what I thought it was going to be after all.
I've only messed with Sonya Roberts plant includes before. I've been
meaning to get back to some trees. Good luck with this idea, and yeah,
who *doesn't* think a lot of the wellknown and useful includes, macros,
etc, shouldn't be included. No one probably, so it must be a secret
password needed to add to the "official" distribution eh? :)
Lewis wrote:
>
> I had another weird idea:
> Let's compile a library of trees, made with Giles macro. Using a macro
> to generate random trees, each one starts it with a different seed and
> sends in the results (the include files). It could be very useful. Maybe
> someone will need a couple of trees sometime. Instead of parsing, say,
> 100ds of them, he will just download them.
> Anyone with me? If there will be enough enthusiasm I'll set up a web
> site or somethin'.
--
omniVERSE: beyond the universe
http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
mailto:inv### [at] aol com?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|
