Funny thing; seems the consensus is for "as seen with the un-aided eye"
instead of by photograph (time exposures and such) and yet there are
focal blurs, motion blurs, etc which are camera effects essentially (ah,
well yes, human eye percieves these as well).


Lance Birch wrote:
> 
> You didn't really tell me what you thought Ken... :-(
> 
> Oh well... yes, I agree with Margus.  The flame is way too bright... (looks
> more like the beginning of a small nuclear explosion actually ;-)
> 
> For a candle an ambient gradient should suffice...
> 
> --
> Lance.
> 
> ---
> For the latest 3D Studio MAX plug-ins, images and much more, go to:
> The Zone - http://come.to/the.zone
> For a totally different experience, visit my Chroma Key Website:
> Colorblind - http://www.fortunecity.com/skyscraper/parallax/359/colorblind
> 
> Ken wrote in message <37139EB9.96DA40EA@pacbell.net>...
> >Margus Ramst wrote:
> >>
> >> Yeah, I'd say that is what a lit candle should look like. The flame is
> too
> >> bright, but I guess that's not the point here.
> >> Still, I'm beginning to wonder if it would be possible to make a
> transluce
> >> with nothing but an ambience gradient...
> >>
> >> Margus
> >
> >Agreed !
> >
> >--
> >Ken Tyler
> >
> >mailto://tylereng@pacbell.net

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News

Post a reply to this message