|
|
Spider wrote:
>
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >
> > I have little tolerance for parse. Something go wrong only by render
> > time is the most aggravating.
> I soooo much agree with you. therefore, it's even more frustrating when
> it crashes..
> > Hey, thought here, parse optimizations:
> hehe, yeah.
>
> > most spurious stuff parsed first, least last ;)
> Well, that ain't easy... hmm, create the output boxes/mesh first, then
> the height-data?? naaa...
> Actually, all the functions have almost the same parse-time. the log is
> a bit slower than the lin...
>
> > Didn't mean to confuse about the pixelization comment. I should have
> > added the word "illusion" and a smilie :)
> ok
>
> > From what I could see, if jaggies were present or not, I would not have
> > noticed much judging by all the sharp contrasting small scale blacks and
> > whites in there (land as well as water part).
> oh.. ;-)
> I'm doing a new render. it has worked for over 8 hours now. I just don't
> seem to end rendering...
Sounds like you need another PC. As they used to say about
clothes in the old days (before I was born), One on, one in the
wash and one spare.
You need a PC to be working on, a PC to be doing the serious
stuff (number crunching), and one to do other bits and pieces on
or use it as a spare.
Cheers
Steve
>
> >
> > Spider wrote:
> > >
> > > > What a parse to render ratio. Wow.
> > > yea... hehe. I think you understand why I'm pretty fed up with the fwrite
> > > crashes .-)
> > >
> >
> > --
> > omniVERSE: beyond the universe
> > http://members.aol.com/inversez/homepage.htm
> > mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?Subject=PoV-News
Post a reply to this message
|
|