That is a possibility, but if I give you a density of .02, you could guess
that a good gather radius would be around 0.1, but if I give you a density
of 2500, what would your initial guess for gather radius be?  I guess you
could use 1/sqrt(2500)*5 ... and maybe that would be OK... would it be too
confusing, or more clear that what I have now?

Comments?

-Nathan

Nieminen Mika wrote:
> 
>   How about this idea:
>   Instead of changing the keyword, you can change the meaning of the
> number following it.
>   Old format: density .02
>   New format: density 2500
> both meaning the same thing.
> 
>   As you say in the documentation, "Actual density per square unit is
> n = 1 / (d*d)".
> 
> --
> main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
> ):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/

Post a reply to this message