I must admit that I don't know much about the LParser language in
particular. Is it equally cryptic as the standard L-System approach with
strings like AAB[BBB]AA[[AA]]BB etc. ?
Well, actually, yesterday under the shower (I do a lot of my creative
thinking there ;-), I *did* ponder about adding a text-script import for
L-Systems to TreeDesiger, to appeal to those people who would rather like to
program their L-Systems, instead of putting them together in the current
editor. Adding support for the L-Parser language (or a subset of it)
shouldn't be to hard then, *if* I ever get around to do it :-(

Johannes.


Alex Magidow wrote in message <36F50D48.C288737C@mninter.net>...
>Hey, Johannes-
>
>I know this is a bit offtopic, but I am wondering- do you ever propose
support
>for lsystems as used in Lparser 4.0? I like their simplicity, and text
based
>interface. If you just added a variable for leaves(with some way to modify
the
>leaftype), then it would be a perfect combination of the two.
>
>
>

Post a reply to this message