Looks good. It almost looks like a Phillip Plisson photograph.

Stephen & Tara
ste### [at] lexiconnetnospam
"All that glitters has a high refractive index."


Spider wrote in message <36DC5702.E4B08B06@bahnhof.se>...
>Hiyas, been working a bit on my own lighthouse.
>Well, lets see now, the camera has a normal to it, not at all subtle, I
have a
>normal on everything actually, it all is pretty random.
>Then there is that little sign. The one I spoke of in .general.
>and, I really _killed_ this image with the jpg. I used a 20% quality
setting,
>really destructive. (the original png was some 2Mb) all those yellow
spotches
>and so on are the jpegs fault. actully, everything is the jpegs fault,
>everything !!! I didn't even render this, I didn't calculate anything, i'm
>INNOCENT! or... nah. pretty much qualityloss anyway :-)
>
>well, tell me what you think.
>
>--
>//Spider
>( spi### [at] bahnhofse ) [ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
>#declare life = rand(seed(42))*sqrt(-1);

Post a reply to this message