|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
crowe <cro### [at] goldinc com> wrote:
: Original (1.0) java was slow. With 1.1 and above performance is
: substantially better improved. I have looked at benchmarks for both
: native "C" and java in doing matrix manipulation (matrix multiplication,
: rotations and transformations) any haven't seen any substantial
: difference between the two (about half the time the Java code won out,
: but always, the two were close). I believe the term that is used is
: "run time compiled byte code"?
So what's the difference between compiled Java and compiled C++ except
that C++ is supported by almost any platfrom while Java isn't?
--
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp -*/
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |