POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.general : java : Re: java Server Time
13 Aug 2024 21:19:12 EDT (-0400)
  Re: java  
From: Nieminen Mika
Date: 25 Feb 1999 07:00:41
Message: <36d53b69.0@news.povray.org>
crowe <cro### [at] goldinccom> wrote:
: Original (1.0) java was slow.  With 1.1 and above performance is
: substantially better improved.  I have looked at benchmarks for both
: native "C" and java in doing matrix manipulation (matrix multiplication,
: rotations and transformations) any haven't seen any substantial
: difference between the two (about half the time the Java code won out,
: but always, the two were close).  I believe the term that is used is
: "run time compiled byte code"?

  So what's the difference between compiled Java and compiled C++ except
that C++ is supported by almost any platfrom while Java isn't?

-- 
main(i){char*_="BdsyFBThhHFBThhHFRz]NFTITQF|DJIFHQhhF";while(i=
*_++)for(;i>1;printf("%s",i-70?i&1?"[]":" ":(i=0,"\n")),i/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.