You see, the power of Lsystems is that you can make fabulous trees, in just a
little bit of programming(19000 objects with 7 lines!). I personally am a very
visual person, but for some reason I find your approach to lsystems confusing.
The advantage of your program is the great export, and the leaves(Of, how nice
it would be to have leaves on my trees! No more winter scenes!) So, a good meld
of the two-Lparser and Treedesigner would be great.

PS- Its not just the format of your lsystems that I have a problem with- its the
weird l-rotation and that stuff- in lparser, you just have ^&+-. Forward, back,
right, left. Very simple. To rotate around the axis, you have < and >. To create
a string, you just do something like: A=+F+F+F+F-F. From then on, you can have A
represent that object, anywhere in your picture.

Johannes Hubert wrote:

> I must admit that I don't know much about the LParser language in
> particular. Is it equally cryptic as the standard L-System approach with
> strings like AAB[BBB]AA[[AA]]BB etc. ?
> Well, actually, yesterday under the shower (I do a lot of my creative
> thinking there ;-), I *did* ponder about adding a text-script import for
> L-Systems to TreeDesiger, to appeal to those people who would rather like to
> program their L-Systems, instead of putting them together in the current
> editor. Adding support for the L-Parser language (or a subset of it)
> shouldn't be to hard then, *if* I ever get around to do it :-(
>
> Johannes.
>
> Alex Magidow wrote in message <36F50D48.C288737C@mninter.net>...
> >Hey, Johannes-
> >
> >I know this is a bit offtopic, but I am wondering- do you ever propose
> support
> >for lsystems as used in Lparser 4.0? I like their simplicity, and text
> based
> >interface. If you just added a variable for leaves(with some way to modify
> the
> >leaftype), then it would be a perfect combination of the two.
> >
> >
> >



--
Only I can prevent narcissism!

Post a reply to this message