They look well enough for seeing the basic differences. But now I'm
thoroughly confused as to how this output varies according to gamma
correction (adjustment, whatever).


Spider wrote:
> 
> Hmm, the wuality was worse than I imagined.
> If you want, I can upload the PNG files(They are only 2k larger than the jpegs.
> And theese jpegs are compressed to 50%)
> 
> --
> //Spider
> ( spi### [at] bahnhofse ) [ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
> #declare life = rand(seed(42))*sqrt(-1);

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?PoV

Post a reply to this message