Bob Hughes wrote:
> 
> I'm rather surprised.
> The two comparison images look very much alike. You didn't state parse
> time in the first... do you mean that the 2nd image "renders" in much
> less time but parses a long while?
The first one had a parse time of 0(!) seconds.

> You seem to have very good caustics on that non-photon mapped image too.
> I like the image itself; those mirrors, if moved closer, or another
> camera angle to see into them better would be great. Love the floor too.
The floor is actually my favourite in the scene. once I get better settings I'll
use a more advanced tree(not much speed difference in normal pov) that looks
better. The mirrors are a test, to see what happens with coloured reflections,
and to see the tree from a different angle.

I'll change the angle of the mirrors(not as convex) and they'll look better.

-- 
//Spider 
( spi### [at] bahnhofse ) [ http://www.bahnhof.se/~spider/ ]
#declare life = rand(seed(42))*sqrt(-1);

Post a reply to this message