Red/blue glasses!? No way, they can be interesting novelty pictures but
not suitable for a good, true 3D, look of an image. Afraid the main
problem is to see the stereo pairs comfortably is to be quite a good
distance away from the monitor screen. The further the easier. And then
you see smaller pictures is the problem there. Nothing compares though
to seeing the raw image as it was rendered, other methods of 3D viewing
compromise something about the image, whether it be color or distortion.
Even the stereo pair method causes distortions due to slight changes
between renders of the individual images, most notably the pixelization
variances similar to 'jitter' being used in animations.
I only attempt this stuff, perfection is not available to me.

Phil Clute wrote:
> 
> Bob Hughes wrote:
> >Hey, if it's jpg artifacts you wanna see check my two gallery pages
> >again (or for the first time) since I've reorganized the webspace. I
> >removed everything and re-made the jpgs using 50% compression (quality)
> 
> >on every picture thats not a gif or a small background image. Preview
> >thumbnails too. It may look kind of disturbing however I managed to cut
> 
> >the space used in half and speed up the load times by a great deal.
> >Thinking of doing an exclusive png gallery for the best of the bunch,
> >giving the viewer a choice. Thank me later ;)
> 
> Yes indeed, that's the stuff.
> Your site does download quicker now. And good
> work on the pov-map, it's pretty cool.
> 
> I can never seem to work those stereo images, I get it for a second and
> then lose it. And when I do get it my eyes are too blurry to make
> anything out.
> Have you ever tried making 3D for the red&blue glasses(or did I just
> miss it?)?
> 
> --
> ...coffee?...yes please! extra sugar,extra cream...Thank you.

-- 
 omniVERSE: beyond the universe
  http://members.aol.com/inversez/POVring.htm
 mailto:inv### [at] aolcom?PoV

Post a reply to this message