That looks very good, at least the part that is closest to the camera.
The only improvement I can think of is more turbulence.
> In particular, the reflections
> of the fur aren't calculated at all.
I don't think I understand what you mean. Reflective fur?
--
Martin Magnusson
Mar### [at] studentuuse
http://www.geocities.com/SoHo/9946/
Post a reply to this message
|