Ken wrote:
> 
> 
>   Jerry Anning has a philosiphy about voting that I think is about the fairest
> approach of any I have heard yet. It echoed my own thought so completely
> I'm reposting his reply he made on the subject in november last year. What
> you will read below is what I would say if only I were a little more gifted as
> a writer ...
> 
> Ken Tyler
> 

I'am glad Ken that you quoted Jerry's post because I also think that
this was a very fair approach to voting even if I can understand Greg's
voting philosophy.

I think it's really fine to have voters with completly different
backgrounds in this competition. While folks like me are more likely to
focus on technical issues voters like Marjorie with a fine arts
background take care that this technical votes don't overpower
everything.

I too try to focus also on the artistic aspect but as the hobby artist
that I am my knowledge about composition, etc. is quite small (I fear my
entries reflect that :-( ).

So everybody has to follow his or her own philosophy that fits with the
personal background. Jerry's post makes sure that one knows that there
are more aspects than the technical ones and gives good hints where to
look.


Marc

-- 
Marc Schimmler

Post a reply to this message