|
 |
On Mon, 7 Dec 1998 22:32:28 -0800, "Chris Jeppesen"
<chr### [at] digiquill com> wrote:
>Doug n' Dinsdale wrote in message <364FF2DA.B4E60860@networx.net.au>...
>Can't you model it directly as an object? I am working on a still that has
>motion blur, and
>it is done by using multiple transparent copies of an object. Sure it takes
>longer to render,
>but it is completeley POV (no patches even) and doesn't require any extra
>software
>
>Chris Jeppesen
I have achieved quite good results with motion blurring, both for
stills and animations. My latest anim was a 1:1000000000000 Mandelbrot
zoom with radial blur... it's cool. The idea is to render *a lot* of
frames and average them using an average pigment. For the M-set anim I
have rendered 1500 frames 160x120 no AA / png (<500 bytes/frame!).
This was really fast. Then I rendered a 300-frame anim, and each frame
was an average of 50 frames back. I can post the source if there's
interest. BTW just an hour ago I sent a mail to the IRTC admins asking
if this is legal... I'll wait and see.
Peter
Post a reply to this message
|
|
