On Sun, 15 Nov 1998 23:33:33 -0500, Jerry Anning <cle### [at] dholcom> wrote:
>Ken wrote:
>> 
>> Dan Connelly wrote:
>> 
>> > this is so trivial there is no reason to change the source code.
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.flash.net/~djconnel/
>> 
>>   I don't believe it's any less trivial than wanting 4 demensional
>> vectors added to the source code. I have recently seen requests
>> for that too. Seems strange in light of the fact you can describe
>> any point in space with the current 3 demensional coordinate
>> system currently in use.
>
>You can't apply built in vector ops to homebrew 4d vectors as it is. 

BTW, what is the cross product of two 4d vectors? :)

Post a reply to this message