Jon Berndt wrote:
> 
> Nathan Kopp wrote in message <361E49AF.3F688077@ltu.edu>...
> >Yes, your density is probably off.  Maybe decreasing it by a factor of 5280
> >will correct the problem (and maybe not)... It's worth a try.
> 
> That might be true. The density is part of the object. I have scaled the
> object up by 5280. I guess I would not need to scale up the density, as
> well. It's hard to tell, it's still new to me. I am not sure how Michael
> Andrews designed the atmosphere and clouds. I'll try dividing by 5280,
> though.
> 
> Jon

From my own experiments it does seem density does not obey scaling as
other objects. It seems it must be adjusted in addition to scalings.

-- 
Lewis A. Sellers: writer and contract Multimedia Website Developer
mailto:lse### [at] usitnet (The Fourth Millennium Foundation)
http://www.public.usit.net/lsellers/ & http://www.intrafoundation.com
http://brain-of-pooh.tech-soft.com/users/critters/bios/sellers_lewis.html

You can bug the living bejesus out of me live on ICQ @ 491461
(If I don't get back to you within a month, I'm out of prozac in some
dark corner somewhere screaming things quite unintelligable but -- most
curiously -- thick with a sumerian accent.)

"The comedy is over" -i pagliacci

Post a reply to this message