I think the first choice is fine for a start.  Perhaps you could file option 2
away until 1 is nice and polished.  Is this going to be something beyond what the
isosurface patch does (ie. uv mapping on a single bezier patch)?

Btw, anyone know what map_types 3 and 4 are supposed to eventually become?

Nathan Kopp wrote:

> If UV mapping were to be implemented in POV , which of the following would you
> prefer?
>
>   1)  regular vs. UV mapping is set for each OBJECT
>   2)  regular vs. UV mapping is set for each PIGMENT, TEXTURE, or NORMAL.
>
> -------------------
> Choice (1) example:
>
> bicubic_patch
> {
>   ...
>   uv_mapping
>   texture { NeatWoodTexture }
> }
>
> -------------------
> Choice (2) example:
>
> bicubic_patch
> {
>   ...
>   texture { uv_mapping NeatWoodTexture }
> }
>

Post a reply to this message