Hi there, not enough guts to put even a nickname up ?

Number one, humour can be nice.
Number two, if it's easy to fix why not give the answer ?
Number three, it is always easy once you found the answer.
Number four, POV-Ray is quite big as a program, I know, there is much bigger than that
and I personally worked on much bigger programs (8MB of source code), yet I will never
dare look down on someone because they did not find something 'easy'. Have you ever
found a pin in a hay stack, well maybe you have : this radiosity bug.
Number five, how many bugs in POV-Ray did you find, and how many did you not find ?
Number six, team work is about helping each other and complementing each other, not
replicating the work.

Got that ?
No I do not intend to be moralistic, just taking sorta distorted mirror image to your
own tone.
I hope you get the message positively,
Cheers (I like to be nice in the end)
Al.


? wrote:

> On Thu, 09 Apr 1998 15:30:35 GMT, ron### [at] farmworkscom (Ronald L. Parker) wrote:
> >Perhaps we just didn't care, since radiosity is an experimental
> >feature and the POV-Team is likely to change it all in a future
> >release.  Y'see, the people who hang out here are NOT the POV-Team.
> >We have even less incentive than they do to take requests, because we
> >mostly do patches we want for ourselves and then make them available
>
> Not at all.  Like I said before, this is no major request.  It's a very simple
> bug to find and correct, and so maybe you didn't see the humor in my post.
> Don't sweat it. I believe anyone could merely look at the code and find the
> problem immiediately.  These ostracizing responses only go to show that you
> guys aren't looking at these parts of the code at all!
>
> Steve :)
> hor### [at] osuedu



--
ANTI SPAM / ANTI ARROSAGE COMMERCIAL :

To answer me, please take out the Z from my address.

Post a reply to this message