On Fri, 10 Apr 1998 21:03:58 +0200, mbr### [at] swipnetse (Mathias Broxvall)
wrote:

>The function engine could either be borrowed from the 
>isosurface patch, or a new functional language could be
>written with a little more imperative touch...
>What do you think? Is it worth the effort?

In what way do the functional textures that are already in the
Isosurface patch not meet your requirements?

Post a reply to this message