|
 |
On Mon, 08 Mar 2004 23:18:34 +0100, Jellby <jel### [at] M-yahoo com>
wrote:
>Among other things, IMBJR wrote:
>
>>>>>You could save even more bandwidth by posting just a link to wherever
>>>>>you choose to upload the file.
>>>>
>>>> I'd still get some saying they could not see the file after following
>>>> the link - so thanks for the suggestion, but it's not going to solve
>>>> that particular problem.
>>>
>>>Wrong!
>>>
>>>Read my post again. I didn't suggest to solve *that* problem, but the
>>>bandwidth problem (which is one of the reasons you're using JPEG2000, you
>>>said). I really think you should read the discussion before you jump with
>>>unrelated answers. ;)
>>
>> Don't be silly. Your parroting back of my arguments just points you
>> out as another one of the crowd hell bent on being obtuse for
>> obtuseness sake.
>
>Parrots are nice animals :)
Some are, and some are nut-greedy little peckers.
>
>Yes, poor me, I was being ironic.
You do not have the verbal skills in this medium to be ironic. I bet
you use emoticons!
> I had a very small hope you would
>understand how annoying some of your comments could be... However, the fact
>remains, I was referring to the possibility of saving bandwidth and storage
>space, and not to the "ease of use" of the format. And please, note that I
>have *not* insulted you, you have (tried to do so).
That bracketted stutter at the end suggests otherwise. Did I hurt your
widdle feelings, uh?
--------------------------------
My First Subgenius Picture Book:
http://www.imbjr.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
