On Thu, 14 Apr 2005 09:03:54 -0500, Shay <dd### [at] dddd> wrote:
> The sensible ways to reply to a clever jab are either 'in kind' or 'not 
> at all'. The ONLY thing different about my sarcasm (besides it's being 
> more decorous than all of the name-calling) and so many other posts on 
> this server is that mine was directed towards perhaps the only person 
> here who does not know this or isn't capable.

I don't see how "Contest continues until an 'acceptable' entry is received."
is directed "towards perhaps the only person". What I refer here is giving
wrong answer in somehow official tone without smile or anything to mark joke.
Ranj, who asked, is new here, he is interested in hearing answer. Your
sarcastic answer without any visible sign that it is a sarcasm didn't help
him. In the past you complained about your feelings in relation to contest but
now you disinform new users which perhaps influences future feelings of the
new persons here. So I ask you to not spread false facts. If you really have
to talk/comment/have fun about other issues, just go to dedicated place.

ABX