POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.beta-test : Known Bugs 24 Dec 2001 (beta 9) : Re: Known Bugs 24 Dec 2001 (beta 9) Server Time
30 Jul 2024 12:25:18 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Known Bugs 24 Dec 2001 (beta 9)  
From: Mike Williams
Date: 1 Jan 2002 01:10:49
Message: <2+c6AKALIVM8Ew9A@econym.demon.co.uk>
Wasn't it Thorsten Froehlich who wrote:
>In article <zsD### [at] econymdemoncouk> , Mike Williams 
><mik### [at] nospamplease>  wrote:
>
>> The given example file (http://news.povray.org/3bdf2d82@news.povray.org)
>> runs a little slower on my machine in beta 9 than it did under beta 8:-
>>
>> beta 6          29 secs
>> beta 7   2 mins  6 secs (reported as a bug)
>> beta 8   1 min  51 secs ("fixed", but obscured by other bugs)
>> beta 9   2 mins  6 secs ("fixed")
>
>Note that the usage of evaluate changed between beta 6 and beta 9.

Is there any chance of having the new functionality documented? The
evaluate documentation is unchanged from beta 6.

I know that the changes were discussed in various threads, but I got a
bit confused thought that the outcome was that almost all of the
functionality of evaluate had been moved into the non-evaluate code, and
that the evaluate keyword was effectively redundant. What does evaluate
still do that causes such a large increase in render times?

-- 
Mike Williams
Gentleman of Leisure


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.