POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.unofficial.patches : Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? : Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions? Server Time
2 Sep 2024 08:14:24 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Why & has higher precedence than + or - in isosurface functions?  
From: Peter Popov
Date: 2 Aug 2000 18:09:25
Message: <1s6hos89l9r0i1bigu46lb40e6bat72dlv@4ax.com>
On 2 Aug 2000 11:12:16 -0400, Warp <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote:

>  Nope. In C a true value is 1 (for example the result of the sentence a==b
>is 1 if a is equal to b, else 0). When testing a conditional, any value
>other than 0 is considered true, and 0 is considered false.

Why am I thinking that this issue has not been standardised yet?
Because I am wrong again? :)

>  The point is that the & operator in isosurface functions is not even close
>to the logical AND-operator of programming languages.

Ah, so *that* is the point I've been missing all this time! 

Can I have a sign?


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.