Chris Huff <chr### [at] yahoocom> wrote:

We are still looking at all your patches. We are going to add more of
them.
Just needs a bit more time and testing. 
We noticed them all ;-) 

We find it easier if the author of the patches is suplying some example
scenes. Now that we received some from you for your patches it's quicker
to work! Thanks for those examples.
Perhaps some more for all your patches? Most of the time is just a
matter of not having enough time to work more quickly.
We want to be more or less sure that there arn't too many bugs left in
paches before we add them.

Smellenbergh

> In article <8E9BE37FEseed7@204.213.191.228>, ing### [at] homenl (ingo) 
> wrote:
> 
> > Lets hope it's noticed now ;)
> > It's perfect in combination with the trace() function and your very own
> > object pattern.
> 
> If it gets added, I hope eval_pattern() gets added too. It is a bit 
> simpler than eval_pigment(), it returns the float value of the pattern
> at the evaluation point.
> 
> Actually, I never thought of using my object pattern with these...it 
> would be a good way to detect whether a point is inside an object, while
> trace() is useful for placing things relative to the surface of the 
> object.


-- 
e-mail:sme### [at] skynetbe

http://users.skynet.be/smellenbergh

Post a reply to this message