Nikodemus Siivola wrote:

> As for the security implications, it would IMO be next to trivial to
> implement a switch that would turn of all potentially harmful
> functionalities (system and fwrite, for example), or even better: function
> along the lines of taint checks in various other languages (Perl and Ruby
> come to mind).

RubyPOV Mmmmmm...
 I'd like to see that!

Post a reply to this message