|
|
On 24/01/2025 14:03, jr wrote:
> sorry, didn't mean to confuse, I must have put it poorly. yes, I'd vote :-) for
> a Tcl-like, transparent to the end-user, compilation of the SDL. but if there
> emerges a design based on a virtual machine rendering "backend", any language
> will need to provide instructions for that, and we could see more than one of
> the "traditional" scripting languages "extended" perhaps to emit "our"
> byte-code.
Thanks for correction. Really, LLVM - based parser could link POV-Ray
with many other languages.
--
YB
Post a reply to this message
|
|