POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.windows : responce to lack Server Time
6 Oct 2024 10:15:07 EDT (-0400)
  responce to lack (Message 31 to 37 of 37)  
<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages
From: Peter Popov
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 4 Jul 2000 18:35:27
Message: <dcp4mskarckg4vdtsm3sdoier75rbsiu72@4ax.com>
On Tue, 04 Jul 2000 15:47:02 -0700, Bruce L <dke### [at] sksympaticoca>
wrote:

>Maybe we could have English passed over to one of those ISO commities,
>and get the whole mess cleared up <g>

I'd rather learn GNU-English when a stable version is out.


Peter Popov ICQ : 15002700
Personal e-mail : pet### [at] usanet
TAG      e-mail : pet### [at] tagpovrayorg


Post a reply to this message

From: Warp
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 6 Jul 2000 12:55:06
Message: <3964b9e9@news.povray.org>
Rick <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
: What sickens me is the British English education system is so dire, even
: most of its own citizens cannot grasp the language correctly.

  I don't know why, but it seems that I am the only person (at least here
in Finland) who doesn't dislike the British accent. Actually it sounds quite
interesting.
  I don't know how to talk with that accent, but I like hearing it :)

-- 
main(i,_){for(_?--i,main(i+2,"FhhQHFIJD|FQTITFN]zRFHhhTBFHhhTBFysdB"[i]
):5;i&&_>1;printf("%s",_-70?_&1?"[]":" ":(_=0,"\n")),_/=2);} /*- Warp -*/


Post a reply to this message

From: Bob Hughes
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 6 Jul 2000 15:43:44
Message: <3964e170@news.povray.org>
"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:3964b9e9@news.povray.org...
| Rick <ric### [at] kitty5com> wrote:
|   I don't know how to talk with that accent, but I like hearing it :)

You must like analog sounds then.  That's what I'd call the English accent
anyhow.  A sort of even undulation from highs and lows at various frequencies,
or sine wave.  And I'd call the southern drawl (from around these parts of the
USA that's our accent) a more saw-toothed analog sound.
Of course, this is mere opinion and I could be totally mistaken about the
comparison.

Bob


Post a reply to this message

From: Nathan Kopp
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 10 Jul 2000 01:18:32
Message: <39695ca8$1@news.povray.org>
lavender <lav### [at] hotmailcom> wrote...
[clip]
> I ask again for the acseptance of my humble apology. The pov team has in
my
> opinion produced an extraordinay program that no other program can touch.
[clip]
> Thank you Pov Team for Povray and the loooong hours you have put into it.

As a POV-Team member, it pleases me more to respond to this post than to
your previous post.  :-)  I just have a few comments.

First, some people are working on a PVM version of MegaPov (a PVM version of
the official version already exists).  This PVM version will allow network
rendering (client/slave) on a Windows network, though it currently doesn't
work with radiosity.

Secondly, I'd like to thank the POV users who stood up for us and all of the
work that we've done.  And I also appreciate your kind comments in this
post.  :-)  It is my desire that your future relationship with members of
the POV community and POV-Team are all positive with a mutual respect and
understanding.  It is unfortunate that we seem to have gotten off on the
wrong foot, but it doesn't have to stay that way.

Sincerely,
Nathan Kopp

I speak for myself and not the POV-Team.


Post a reply to this message

From: Greg M  Johnson
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 17 Jul 2000 10:50:37
Message: <39731C14.5B112B10@my-dejanews.com>
Your attitude might be appropriate when directed to someone who were to make a
non-working modeller and then were sassy to people who try to get help.

This attitude is ridiculous when applied to our good friends the pov team, who
reaffirm our faith in the nobleness of humanity.

Would demoralizing freeware programmers help the financial bottom line of Newtek?

lavender wrote:

> Grand I finally provoke a hidden pov team member to finially come out in to the
> light and talk to me. I have triied to get this for a while now.
>
> One: Why are you programming POVRAY?
> My hope answer: To produce the best and most capable program to your abilities.
> Why my stance: The limits you have placed on povray show you amount of pride in
> your work. If a process is available you should not count it out just because
> you do not want to put your time into your creation. You should try harder to
> do what you have set out to do. I complaine about the pov team backing off of
> their commitment to all of us that use the very program the team created. It is
> called integraty. If I say I will do something I must do it. If I only go half
> way I lack integraty.
>
> You claim how difficult it is to do what I have sudjested but I have done just
> what I have asked with clumsey and slow code. It does not dive directly into
> the pov code but uses Povray as an engine. That tells me that it is not that
> difficult to do.
>
> Secondly men where able to send a person to the moon useing a slide rule so any
> rebuff from the pov team about what can and can not be done is a result of
> their direct willingness to apply the energy required.
>
> One of these post stated that there is no other program that uses network
> rendering over multiple platforms. I would send them to the Newtek site.
>
> http://www.newtek.com
>
> Lightwave has been doing this for a very long time. And yes they have radiosity
> also. They are driven by money. The pov team should be driven by pride. This is
> a great accomplishment they have in creating a program such as povray with no
> direct finatial input and limited time. To fall short now is like an athlete
> training hard and winning some local meets and then going to the olipics just
> to set in the stands.
>
> The Pov team has the knowlage and the ability to make Povray the most powerfull
> program available. They just need to be pushed like an athalete to perform at
> the level we all know they can reach.


Post a reply to this message

From: Greg M  Johnson
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 17 Jul 2000 10:54:59
Message: <39731D1A.B5A5D547@my-dejanews.com>
Warp wrote:

>   On the other hand people will never learn to write correctly if no-one
> tells them what they are doing wrong.
>   I personally would like people telling me if I write something wrong, but
> I have gave up long time ago because people are "too" polite for that. I have
> no other alternative but learn english just by reading others texts.
>

On the other hand people will never learn to write correctly if NO ONE WERE TO
tell them what they are doing wrong.

I personally would like people TO TELL ME IF I WERE TO WRITE something wrong.

Just kidding, but I think this is the more correct usage.


Post a reply to this message

From: Ron Parker
Subject: Re: responce to lack
Date: 17 Jul 2000 12:43:36
Message: <slrn8n6ek8.v7.ron.parker@linux.parkerr.fwi.com>
On Mon, 17 Jul 2000 10:50:02 -0400, Greg M. Johnson wrote:
>On the other hand people will never learn to write correctly if NO ONE WERE TO
                          ^^^^ would
>tell them what they are doing wrong.

-- 
Ron Parker   http://www2.fwi.com/~parkerr/traces.html
My opinions.  Mine.  Not anyone else's.


Post a reply to this message

<<< Previous 10 Messages Goto Initial 10 Messages

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.