On 21 Feb 2008 16:29:44 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:48:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>
>> On 21 Feb 2008 13:54:09 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>> 
>>>Oh, I thought we were talking about English, not American. <scnr>
>> 
>> It is a living language ye ken :) + > :) [for your missed one]
>
>Ah, if it is, then, why are ye speaking like that? ;-)
>

Who said that I speak English? 

BTW my wife says that my first language is jumble ;)
And you reply sounds strange with an American accent :-)


Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 22:53:17 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 21 Feb 2008 16:29:44 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
>>On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 20:48:49 +0000, Stephen wrote:
>>
>>> On 21 Feb 2008 13:54:09 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom>
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>>Oh, I thought we were talking about English, not American. <scnr>
>>> 
>>> It is a living language ye ken :) + > :) [for your missed one]
>>
>>Ah, if it is, then, why are ye speaking like that? ;-)
>>
>>
> Who said that I speak English?

Well, I am making an assumption that, as an English person, you're a 
steward of the language. <G>

> BTW my wife says that my first language is jumble ;) And you reply
> sounds strange with an American accent :-)

T'was meant to. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

"Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message 
news:op.t6vtnkamc3xi7v@news.povray.org...
> And lo on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:36:30 -0000, Brian Elliott 
> <NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> did spake, saying:
>
>> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message 
>> news:op.t6vagj2ec3xi7v@news.povray.org...
>>> And lo on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:37:25 -0000, andrel 
>>> <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
>>>
>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:18:20 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>>>>> I'd even buy a bowler if it got me closer to a Diana Rigg 
>>>>>> look-a-like ;-)
>>>>>>
>>>>> Who wouldn't?
>>>>>
>>>> Anyone who does not particularly fancy 70 year old ladies?
>>>
>>> I thought everyone knew that all Bowler hats were equipped with 
>>> personal time machines?
>>
>> Ah.  And there I was, relying on a long striped scarf.
>
> I thought they were all recalled for safety reasons, too many people 
> tripping up and squishing the wrong butterfly.

You know, I did that once, tripped and accidentally landed in 100,000 BC. 
The disturbed butterfly distracted a Neaterthal's attention just long enough 
to be clubbed senseless by a Cro-Magnon who'd just appeared on the scene and 
was about to be tied into a giant pretzel by the big guy.

Didn't tell anyone when I got back.

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:34:12 -0000, Brian Elliott  
<NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> did spake, saying:

>
> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message  
> news:op.t6vtnkamc3xi7v@news.povray.org...
>> And lo on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:36:30 -0000, Brian Elliott  
>> <NotForSpam@AskIfUWant> did spake, saying:
>>
>>> "Phil Cook" <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote in message  
>>> news:op.t6vagj2ec3xi7v@news.povray.org...
>>>> And lo on Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:37:25 -0000, andrel  
>>>> <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> did spake, saying:
>>>>
>>>>> Stephen wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:18:20 -0000, "Phil Cook"
>>>>>>> I'd even buy a bowler if it got me closer to a Diana Rigg  
>>>>>>> look-a-like ;-)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Who wouldn't?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Anyone who does not particularly fancy 70 year old ladies?
>>>>
>>>> I thought everyone knew that all Bowler hats were equipped with  
>>>> personal time machines?
>>>
>>> Ah.  And there I was, relying on a long striped scarf.
>>
>> I thought they were all recalled for safety reasons, too many people  
>> tripping up and squishing the wrong butterfly.
>
> You know, I did that once, tripped and accidentally landed in 100,000  
> BC. The disturbed butterfly distracted a Neaterthal's attention just  
> long enough to be clubbed senseless by a Cro-Magnon who'd just appeared  
> on the scene and was about to be tied into a giant pretzel by the big  
> guy.
>
> Didn't tell anyone when I got back.

We can only be thankful you didn't drop any jelly babies too.

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:57:48 -0000, Jim Henderson  
<nos### [at] nospamcom> did spake, saying:

> On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 09:28:37 +0000, Phil Cook wrote:
>
>>>> Except we're back to why 'you' have the weapon in the first place.
>>>
>>> Well, *I* don't, because I'd want it to be stored safely.
>>
>> Our language really needs to (re)introduce some terms for "you" -
>> singular, personal; plural personal; plural imnpersonal i.e. you go and
>> help him; you, that group there, go and help him; you as a country
>> should help him.
>
> Well, it's your language - fix it. ;-)

Maybe if we rebooted it?

>>>  I have other
>>> ways of dealing with an intruder - fortunately, where we live, that's
>>> not much of a danger.  Most of the crime around here is car prowls and
>>> vandalism.
>>
>> We've had some break-ins locally, a bit of vandalism, some stabbings in
>> town; the usual kind of thing.
>
> Stabbings, I don't think we have often here

Call that a knife? No I call it a gun [bang]?

> - we meet about monthly with
> our local police liason (part of our community meetings), so we keep
> pretty aware of what crimes are going on in the neighborhood.  There's a
> bit more drug crime a few blocks west of us (the parks seem to attract it
> around here), but around here it's pretty safe.

Drink and drugs, but I guess you don't get the drink bit so much.  
Re-checking some bits apparently Worcestershire's drug problem is above  
average for the country while violent crime is slightly lower; make of  
that what you will :-)

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

On 21 Feb 2008 18:08:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:

>
>Well, I am making an assumption that, as an English person, you're a 
>steward of the language. <G>
>

Ouch!

>> BTW my wife says that my first language is jumble ;) And you reply
>> sounds strange with an American accent :-)
>
>T'was meant to. ;-)

I knew that y'all :)

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

And lo on Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:31:54 -0000, Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom>  
did spake, saying:

> On 21 Feb 2008 18:08:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
>
>>
>> Well, I am making an assumption that, as an English person, you're a
>> steward of the language. <G>
>
> Ouch!

Haha he called you English, stitch 'im :-P

-- 
Phil Cook

--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:39:47 -0000, "Phil Cook"
<phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:

>Haha he called you English, stitch 'im :-P

Colonials, how do you expect them to know the finer points? :)

Regards
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:31:54 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On 21 Feb 2008 18:08:01 -0500, Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> 
> 
>>Well, I am making an assumption that, as an English person, you're a
>>steward of the language. <G>
>>
>>
> Ouch!
> 
>>> BTW my wife says that my first language is jumble ;) And you reply
>>> sounds strange with an American accent :-)
>>
>>T'was meant to. ;-)
> 
> I knew that y'all :)

I'm fure you did, Ftephen. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:57:27 +0000, Stephen wrote:

> On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 15:39:47 -0000, "Phil Cook"
> <phi### [at] nospamrocainfreeservecouk> wrote:
> 
>>Haha he called you English, stitch 'im :-P
> 
> Colonials, how do you expect them to know the finer points? :)

Ah, I do, but I do like to wind my friends up. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message