 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 15:08:31 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 10:45:11 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> >Am I that bad? :)
>>
>> That is up to you :)
>
>I think, it's a unique style. That screens me from thinking bad of myself. :-)
I was thinking more along the lines of this nursery rhyme:
When she was good, she was very, very good
And when she was bad she was terrific.
<Ducks and runs away>
>> >> >What did I do wrong?
>> >>
>> >> Not posting a RSOACP :)
>> >
>> >I knew, I've forgotten something.
>> >
>> Yup! :)
>>
>solved
>
Artistic.
>And I really wore those toads as watches while mating season. Also I was the
>only girl between many boys. :)
>And not showing off again, but have to tell this: I was the fastest
>newts-catcher in the group!!!
>
>>It's amazing what you can find by rummaging through mom and dad's medicine cabinet
and under the kitchen sink...
>
>and that could make explosions? :-)
>
Take a tin can with a lid (Treacle or Golden syrup) punch a hole in the lid and
the bottom. Fill it with gas and light the top. It will blow the lid meters into
the air.
Sugar and weedkiller - boom.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Mike Raiford wrote:
>
>> If you don't see a live giraffe as a small child, you'll grow up to be
>> like Andrew, or worse ...
>
> ...which is all the more amusing given that I *did* see several live
> gairaffe as a small child.
>
As a matter of fact there are more Andrews in this world. From the
context you might assume he means you, but it could also be a gross
misjudgment of your importance in this world. ;)
> And while we're on the subject, I can think of plenty of other people
> that it would be far worse to turn into. :-P
>
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
bluetree wrote:
> Ugh.
> What should happen doing such a nasty thing?
> I would pray to the porcelain god, seeing a princess kissing a toad like they do
> in some fairytales.
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/funny-pictures-frog-prince-kiss.jpg
--
Tim Cook
http://empyrean.digitalartsuk.com
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Tim Cook <z99### [at] bellsouth net> wrote:
> bluetree wrote:
> > Ugh.
> > What should happen doing such a nasty thing?
> > I would pray to the porcelain god, seeing a princess kissing a toad like they do
> > in some fairytales.
>
>
http://icanhascheezburger.files.wordpress.com/2008/01/funny-pictures-frog-prince-kiss.jpg
Ugh.
That's not a real animal, is it?
Or at least a padded one. Those eyes are looking crazy.
We did not catch such ugly ones.
It were those beautiful creatures:
http://www.dkimages.com/discover/Home/Animals/Amphibians/Frogs-and-Toads/Families/Toads/Marine-Toad/Marine-Toad-1.html
Uah. *shivering* (your picture cannot be real!!)
bluetree
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> I was thinking more along the lines of this nursery rhyme:
> When she was good, she was very, very good
> And when she was bad she was terrific.
> <Ducks and runs away>
^^
Stay here and wait for an answer! Are you a man or a mouse.
Mouse, hm, where is the cat lady, when you need her? ;-)
> Artistic.
No comments allowed, but compliments are always welcome!
> Take a tin can with a lid (Treacle or Golden syrup) punch a hole in the lid and
> the bottom. Fill it with gas and light the top. It will blow the lid meters into
> the air.
> Sugar and weedkiller - boom.
I see, why they didn't let you do experiments at school, did they?
You had too much knowledge of doing explosions.
You blew up sugar? How did that look like? (I don't want to try it myself.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 03:29:08 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>^^
>Stay here and wait for an answer! Are you a man or a mouse.
>Mouse, hm, where is the cat lady, when you need her? ;-)
>
Squeak, Squeak
>
>> Take a tin can with a lid (Treacle or Golden syrup) punch a hole in the lid and
>> the bottom. Fill it with gas and light the top. It will blow the lid meters into
>> the air.
>> Sugar and weedkiller - boom.
>
>I see, why they didn't let you do experiments at school, did they?
But they did let us do experiments, we just kept the dangerous ones quiet.
>You had too much knowledge of doing explosions.
>You blew up sugar? How did that look like? (I don't want to try it myself.)
>
No I did not make a bomb with sugar and fertiliser I made my own gunpowder. In
those days you could buy saltpetre and sulphur in a chemist (separately of
course) charcoal was easy to make or buy.
I think that it stood me well in later life when I had to stop explosions and
fires in the Oil Industry.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> But they did let us do experiments, we just kept the dangerous ones quiet.
And you had never to visit a new school for some times, when they had to rebuild
your school building? ;)
Okay, no silent explosions.
> No I did not make a bomb with sugar and fertiliser I made my own gunpowder. In
> those days you could buy saltpetre and sulphur in a chemist (separately of
> course) charcoal was easy to make or buy.
> I think that it stood me well in later life when I had to stop explosions and
> fires in the Oil Industry.
But you didn't stop it with selfmade gunpowder, did you? :)
But you are sooo right. It is really a helpful experience. (If I had made that,
I wouldn't have been too careful at my very first experiments. [remembering
myself asking every time "Is that right? Can I make that this way?"])
Regards
bluetree
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:12:39 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
>> But they did let us do experiments, we just kept the dangerous ones quiet.
>
>And you had never to visit a new school for some times, when they had to rebuild
>your school building? ;)
Actually my school did burn down the year I was due to go to it (12 ~ 18 years).
My Father (a fireman) was there and he said that some of the younger kids tried
to stop them putting it out, by pleading mostly.
>Okay, no silent explosions.
???
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
> Actually my school did burn down the year I was due to go to it (12 ~ 18 years).
> My Father (a fireman) was there and he said that some of the younger kids tried
> to stop them putting it out, by pleading mostly.
lol
but they didn't succeed?
> >Okay, no silent explosions.
> ???
Only thinking, that you couldn't have done explosions, because you did silently
dangerous experiments. :)
Regards
bluetree
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 06:22:59 EST, "bluetree" <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>Stephen <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote:
>> Actually my school did burn down the year I was due to go to it (12 ~ 18 years).
>> My Father (a fireman) was there and he said that some of the younger kids tried
>> to stop them putting it out, by pleading mostly.
>
>lol
>but they didn't succeed?
Well the school was burnt down and had to be demolished. We were schooled in
another school building that had just been vacated.
Regards
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
