 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> for now, just being able to show the whole tree would be great: for as
> small as 2 paragraphs of text, the container clips the diagram and
> you're not able to see the whole tree. Redimensioning the container or
> scroll bars would be nice... :)
Redimensioning won't help you. If the tree gets to more than about 4
levels deep, the nodes become so densely packed as to be unreadable anyway.
Fixing this would presumably require a *real* node layout algorithm...
(The thought just flickered through my mind: Maybe I should have used
Google Charts inside of all this JavaScript DOM SVG craziness. But I
don't think Google Charts can do node graphs yet...)
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
nemesis wrote:
> html5 canvas is for bitmap drawing. Vector drawing with SVG will be as
> much of a getto as Adobe Illustrator is next to Photoshop...
Oh. I thought it also did 3D stuff, or at least had lines. I know there's
some sort of extension for 3D stuff too, webgl or something?
> you're only annoyed that IE never got around at implementing it...
No, just ignorant.
> Imperative, somehow, is much more popular than functional style,
Not in lots of graphic stuff like animation.
> This preference seems to go well even among artists!, who would guess? :p
I've seen very few animation programs doing imperative stuff, beyond
simulations of real-life things that can't easily be expressed in closed form.
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> After the hours of development work I put into this?
I realized after I posted this that I failed to say that actually *is*
pretty cool, btw. :-)
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Serving Suggestion:
"Don't serve this any more. It's awful."
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On 15/10/2010 09:55 PM, Darren New wrote:
> I realized after I posted this that I failed to say that actually *is*
> pretty cool, btw. :-)
Heh. What did you *think* I wanted programmatically-drawn vector
graphics for? ;-)
I'm pretty sure I posted a full, *working* Huffman encoder/decoder here
before. (If I didn't, I definitely did implement it.) And another for
LZW. And yet another for arithmetic coding. Unfortunately I am too
stupid to implement PPM correctly.
I've implemented other things too, but I can't remember what off the top
of my head.
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Selecting the text in a <textarea> is a HTML5 feature?
Seriously, you're kidding me, right?
I'm sure that can't be correct... Surely such a trivial feature has been
present for years!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
