 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Complicated enough??
(You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
this information togather...)
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'intel cpu v1.png' (16 KB)
Preview of image 'intel cpu v1.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
> Complicated enough??
>
> (You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
> this information togather...)
Isn't it all on this page?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_microprocessors
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> (You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
>> this information togather...)
>
> Isn't it all on this page?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_microprocessors
No. Actually this doesn't describe *any* Core i3, Core i5 or Core i7
processors, only the older Core 1 and Core 2. The requisit pages are
linked at the bottom.
Even here, the information isn't in a particularly easy form to
assimilate. This table summarises it at a glance.
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Am 06.05.2010 11:20, schrieb scott:
>> Complicated enough??
>>
>> (You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
>> this information togather...)
>
> Isn't it all on this page?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_microprocessors
Did you actually bother to /read/ the article? There's exactly /one/
single place where it mentions i3, i5 and i7 respectively: The "see
also" section :-P
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Complicated enough??
>
> (You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
> this information togather...)
Damnit, and I *still* forgot to include the required RAM types... *sigh*
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Invisible wrote:
> Damnit, and I *still* forgot to include the required RAM types... *sigh*
Fixed.
Now all I need to do is stare at 20,000 benchmarks and slowly go mad...
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'intel cpu v1.png' (18 KB)
Preview of image 'intel cpu v1.png'
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
>> Isn't it all on this page?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Intel_Core_microprocessors
>
> Did you actually bother to /read/ the article?
No :-)
> There's exactly /one/
> single place where it mentions i3, i5 and i7 respectively: The "see
> also" section :-P
Well there you go!
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
On Thu, 06 May 2010 11:16:36 +0200, Invisible <voi### [at] dev null> wrote:
> Complicated enough??
>
> (You have no idea how many different sources I had to consult to piece
> this information togather...)
Core i7 980X Extreme Edition
*drool*
-Nekar Xenos-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
Nekar Xenos wrote:
> Core i7 980X Extreme Edition
> *drool*
http://uk.insight.com/apps/productpresentation/index.php?product_id=ITOA06ZGW
Drool all you want, you can't afford it. ;-)
Then again, several of the benchmarks I've looked at have the 2-core
Core i3 chips at the top of the table, with the 6-core EE chip several
seconds slower. (Multithreaded, MUCH?)
The real question, of course, is whether the triple-channel RAM (which
makes the motherboard 120% more expensive) is actually worth it... This
seems to vary by benchmark.
I wonder how long it will take for hexacore to become cost-effective?
(Or how long before software starts using it - most software I've seen
is still doggedly single-threaded!)
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
And lo On Thu, 06 May 2010 10:33:27 +0100, Invisible <voi### [at] devnull> did
spake thusly:
> Invisible wrote:
>
>> Damnit, and I *still* forgot to include the required RAM types... *sigh*
>
> Fixed.
>
> Now all I need to do is stare at 20,000 benchmarks and slowly go mad...
Tcch where are the frequency ranges and the L3 cache sizes?
I know the feeling though as DaBoss is throwing in the towel with Windows
and PC's and wants to go down the dominatrix route with Apple. So i7 or i5
processor, which ones are they using - doesn't say. Well how many cores
does it have - doesn't say. Okay something simple, he complains about the
weight of his laptop so roughly how much does each 'size' weigh - doesn't
say.
Digging around beyond the configuration screen it states they're using the
32nm dual cores, tying that to the speeds and the 2xRAM sticks means the
i5-540M and the i7-620M, still can't find weights except "light" and still
no built-in Blu-ray option, go figure.
--
Phil Cook
--
I once tried to be apathetic, but I just couldn't be bothered
http://flipc.blogspot.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
